Netgear RAX35 Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream AX3000 Dual-Band Wi-Fi 6 Wireless Router

MX00117045 RAX35 Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream AX3000 Dual-Band Wi-Fi 6 Wireless Router
MX00117045 RAX35 Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream AX3000 Dual-Band Wi-Fi 6 Wireless Router MX00117045 RAX35 Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream AX3000 Dual-Band Wi-Fi 6 Wireless Router MX00117045 RAX35 Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream AX3000 Dual-Band Wi-Fi 6 Wireless Router MX00117045 RAX35 Nighthawk AX4 4-Stream AX3000 Dual-Band Wi-Fi 6 Wireless Router

Customer Reviews

Average Rating: 3.0 / 5 With 1 Customer Reviews

Review Submitted!

Your product review has been submitted! Our moderation team will take a look and if meets our submission guidelines you should see it online shortly.

Review Guidelines

  • Please keep your review to your experiences with the product and how well it performs.
  • Please only review product(s) you have used or owned.
  • Please use appropriate language that is suitable for all ages.
  • Review was not provided in exchange for promotional or commercial reimbursement (i.e. monetary, gift cards, free or discounted products).
If the guidelines are not followed your review may not be accepted.
Review Submission
Captcha
  • 1
Monday, December 20, 2021
By: Jeremy Wildsmith
From: Langley

Very poor QoS

Strengths:

It’s a decent router for everyday use. Absolutely fine for anything but gaming.

Weaknesses:

Very poor QoS. Firmware is buggy and manually adjusting the QoS priority via web interface is completely ignored by the router. The changes never save. I’ve looked up online and apparently there’s various workarounds, such as factory resetting it etc. While that may work, for a $150 dollar router, this is completely unacceptable. Finally, routers QoS is generally just broken. If I enable it, some devices are dynamically allocated a higher priority but others have virtually no access to network. Even the web interface on the local gateway is completely inaccessible by my laptop after I enable QoS. Again, not sure exactly what’s happening here, but it’s not normal operation for a $150 router. Finally, if you do run into bufferbloat issues (like I did) this router doesn’t have much in the way of solving them. QoS is broken and it doesn’t support other options like SQM.

Additional Comments:

Okay for typical use, but QoS is completely unusable and there is no alternative in the firmware.
  • 1