Kingston DataTraveler Exodia USB Flash Drive, 64GB

MX00116682 DataTraveler Exodia USB Flash Drive, 64GB
MX00116682 DataTraveler Exodia USB Flash Drive, 64GB MX00116682 DataTraveler Exodia USB Flash Drive, 64GB MX00116682 DataTraveler Exodia USB Flash Drive, 64GB MX00116682 DataTraveler Exodia USB Flash Drive, 64GB

Customer Reviews

Average Rating: 2.2 / 5 With 5 Customer Reviews

Review Submitted!

Your product review has been submitted! Our moderation team will take a look and if meets our submission guidelines you should see it online shortly.

Review Guidelines

  • Please keep your review to your experiences with the product and how well it performs.
  • Please only review product(s) you have used or owned.
  • Please use appropriate language that is suitable for all ages.
  • Review was not provided in exchange for promotional or commercial reimbursement (i.e. monetary, gift cards, free or discounted products).
If the guidelines are not followed your review may not be accepted.
Review Submission
Captcha
  • 1
Sunday, December 3, 2023
By: Matthew Spurrill
From: Saskatoon

SLOW! Supposed to get about 3Gb/s but only get 0.08Gbps

Strengths:

Cheap

Weaknesses:

SLOW!!!

Additional Comments:

This drive does not perform as advertised at all. USB 3.2 Gen 1 is supposed to be capable of speeds up to 4.8Gb/s but realistically you would only see about 3.2Gb/s. HOWEVER! This drive maxes out at a mere 80Mb/s or 10MB/s as Windows reports it. Even if I didn't know the difference between Mb and MB neither measurement is anywhere near the advertised read/write speed.
Tuesday, April 11, 2023
By: KerryP
From: Winnipeg

Insanely slow write speeds, decent read speeds on the two I purchased. No info on reliability yet.

Strengths:

Extremely low price, especially if purchased on sale. Read speeds are good enough to use as a utility drive with Ventoy or similar.

Weaknesses:

Write speeds are worse than USB 2 max even on a USB 3 port. Would not be usable as a general transfer drive. If you aren't in a rush or you have data you read often and seldom update, the poor write speed might be worth the cost savings.

Additional Comments:

Crystal diskmark results: [Read] SEQ 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 114.591 MB/s [ 109.3 IOPS] < 72492.65 us> SEQ 1MiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 113.506 MB/s [ 108.2 IOPS] < 9231.55 us> RND 4KiB (Q= 32, T= 1): 7.080 MB/s [ 1728.5 IOPS] < 18468.14 us> RND 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 6.829 MB/s [ 1667.2 IOPS] < 599.30 us> [Write] SEQ 1MiB (Q= 8, T= 1): 19.674 MB/s [ 18.8 IOPS] <410739.74 us> SEQ 1MiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 19.485 MB/s [ 18.6 IOPS] < 52355.87 us> RND 4KiB (Q= 32, T= 1): 1.728 MB/s [ 421.9 IOPS] < 74515.31 us> RND 4KiB (Q= 1, T= 1): 1.830 MB/s [ 446.8 IOPS] < 2236.25 us>
Thursday, January 5, 2023
By: Calab
From: Calgary

Slowwwwwwwww...

Strengths:

It was cheap. It fits a USB Type-A port.

Weaknesses:

These are SLOW. No activity light.

Additional Comments:

Bought a couple of these on sale. They do seem to work, but are VERY slow, even in a USB 3.2 port.
Friday, May 6, 2022
By: Matt
From: Saskatoon

I think I can...

Strengths:

I guess it was cheap?

Weaknesses:

The main issue is that it will start off with a lot of steam and even hit 19MB/s but then repeatedly stall for 5 to 10 seconds at 0Bytes/s. Each time it jumps up to 19MB/s you hope it will keep going, but it just stalls after a few seconds and repeats on and on making you wish you had never gotten the piece of junk.

Additional Comments:

Watching this drive get even a Two GB file written to it is like hearing the little train that could story as a toddler. It's painfully slow but once it is over you never want to hear/see it again. Really disappointed even though I got it on sale for $10 I expected more from a Kingston product.
Wednesday, December 1, 2021
By: Fluffy Snakes
From: Edmonton

64 GB is not as good as previous Exodia 32 GB drive

Strengths:

Not as good as tests two weeks ago on a similar Exodia 32 GB drive. During continuous writing, this 64 GB drive writes at 5 MB/s for about 15 seconds and then stalls for 8 seconds, in a repeating pattern, averaging a lousy 3.4 MB/s overall. The 32 GB drive wrote at a steady 10 MB/s. The 64 GB average read speed was 24.7 MB/s, which is only 2/3 of what USB 2.0 typically does, and not even close to USB 3.x speeds. The 32 GB drive was over 33 MB/s. It's like they have completely different controller chips inside. There were no errors on a full write and read back of pseudo-random data. You get the storage you paid for but ... slowly. The previous 32 GB sample was definitely worth five stars; this 64 GB sample is a big disappointment.

Weaknesses:

Actual capacity is 57.62 GB, as compared to the nominal or advertised 64 GB.

Additional Comments:

Thank you to Memory Express for their Price Protection guarantee. Here are the test programs, if you have Java installed on your computer: https://github.com/kwfenske/drive-speed-java or https://github.com/kwfenske/erase-disk-java
  • 1